I'm a hardcore Mac OS X fan, but since the introduction of the Mac Pro back in 2006 the prices have been ridiculous for what you get. When I bought my G5 in 2004 I got at dual core 2.5 GHz system for under $3000 when there still weren't any realistic dual core PC options. It was a great system for the price. The Mac Pro, however, is under-powered and over-priced. Let's look at a good ol' side-by-side comparison:
PC | Mac Pro |
Intel i7-950 3.06 GHz Quad-Core | Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz Quad-Core |
6GB DDR3 RAM | 3GB DDR3 RAM |
Two 1TB 7200RPM HDD (RAID0) | 1 TB 7200RPM HDD |
Blu-Ray Burner | DVD Burner |
ATI Radeon HD 6850 w/ 1GB GDDR5 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 w/ 1GB GDDR5 |
$1300 | $2500 |
For half the price you get quite a bit more. The Intel i7-9xx series CPUs are overclocking beasts, surpassing 4 GHz on air and even higher speeds with water cooling. A huge bump in CPU performance, twice the RAM, twice the hard drive space with a speed boost from a RAID configuration, nearly twice the graphics performance, and built-in Blu-Ray makes the Mac Pro look foolish. Apple should be embarrassed by this system. Adding $1000 to the Mac doubles the RAM and gets you eight cores (at only 2.4 GHz). Still not a great system, especially for the money, in my opinion. I would say the i7 at over 4 GHz would give the octo-core Mac Pro a run for its money in most normal and moderately heavy real-world tasks.
Is OS X worth $1200 and a big performance hit? OS X is a wonderful OS, but for a heavy-hitter system for video editing and encoding, you'd be using just about the same programs for each platform. OS X just isn't worth that much of a sacrifice. Plus you'd have to add on a Blu-Ray burner if you actually want to store your HD footage. Sorry Apple, but this is one battle that you've clearly lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment